OpenAI’s Open-Source Revolution: GPT-OSS vs. Meta’s Llama vs. DeepSeek

In a surprise move in August 2025, OpenAI “open-sourced” its AI by releasing GPT-OSS, its first open-weight models since GPT-2 back in 2019. This shift represents a dramatic departure from OpenAI’s historically closed approach and reflects the company’s recognition that it had been on the wrong side of the debate regarding open-source AI. The decision is significant because it reshapes the competitive landscape for both technology enthusiasts and enterprise leaders. With GPT-OSS, OpenAI is now directly challenging Meta’s widely adopted Llama models and China’s rapidly advancing DeepSeek system, two open-source initiatives that have been gaining momentum. In this post, we will explore what GPT-OSS is, how it compares to Llama and DeepSeek, and what this open-source revolution means for the AI landscape.

‍

What is OpenAI’s GPT-OSS?

GPT-OSS (OpenAI’s Open-Source GPT models) refers to a pair of advanced language models that OpenAI released with fully open model weights. In practical terms, OpenAI has published the neural network parameters under a permissive license, allowing anyone to download, run, fine-tune, and deploy the models. This release represents a major shift in the company’s strategy, as these models are engineered not only for natural language generation but also for advanced reasoning and “agentic” capabilities.

Here’s a quick rundown of GPT-OSS:

Two model versions: GPT-OSS-120B and GPT-OSS-20B. The “120B” model contains 117 billion parameters, while the “20B” model contains 21 billion parameters. Both use a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture in which only a fraction of the total parameters (about 5.1 billion in the larger model and 3.6 billion in the smaller model) are active per token. This design delivers much greater efficiency compared to traditional dense models of similar size.
Accessibility on common hardware: The 120B version is designed to run on a single high-end GPU with roughly 80 GB of memory, such as an NVIDIA H100. The 20B version can operate on devices with only 16 GB of memory, making it feasible to run on a consumer-grade laptop or a standard cloud instance. This significantly lowers the barrier for experimentation and deployment.
Expanded context window. Both models support a context length of up to 128,000 tokens. This enables them to handle very long documents or extended conversations without losing earlier information. For comparison, GPT-4’s publicly available API in 2023 was limited to 32,000 tokens.
Reasoning and tool use. GPT-OSS has been trained with techniques from OpenAI’s latest internal models to perform multi-step reasoning and to integrate with external tools such as web search or code execution. The models are capable of producing step-by-step reasoning and provide transparency into their thought process, which researchers and developers can inspect or adjust.
Open and permissive license: GPT-OSS is released under the Apache 2.0 license, one of the most permissive open licenses. This allows free use, modification, and commercial deployment with minimal restrictions. OpenAI distinguishes “open-weight” from “open-source” because the training data is not released. However, from a user’s standpoint, full access to the model itself is available.

‍

GPT-OSS vs. Llama vs. DeepSeek – At a Glance

Feature	GPT-OSS	Meta’s Llama	DeepSeek
Architecture	Mixture-of-Experts (MoE). The 120B model contains 117 billion total parameters, with about 5 billion active per token. Highly efficient, with performance comparable to models two to three times larger.	Dense transformer with up to 405B parameters in Llama 3.1. All parameters are active for each token.	Large-scale MoE with 671 billion total parameters and about 37 billion active per token. Uses Multi-Head Latent Attention for expert routing.
Training Style	Hybrid approach combining reinforcement learning, guidance from OpenAI’s proprietary models, and supervised fine-tuning.	Standard supervised learning combined with RLHF. No emphasis on transparent reasoning.	Predominantly reinforcement learning, with the model developing reasoning strategies autonomously.
Reasoning Ability	Optimized for complex reasoning, coding, and chain-of-thought tasks. Can reveal reasoning steps when prompted.	Strong general-purpose language ability, but reasoning transparency is not built in.	Excels at reasoning, particularly in mathematics and coding, with reasoning steps shown by default.
Hardware Needs	Runs on a single high-end GPU or a strong laptop. Smaller models are available for lighter environments.	Smaller Llama 2 models (7B and 13B) are lightweight, while larger models require multi-GPU setups.	Too large for single GPU use. Typically requires multi-GPU or distributed systems.
Performance Benchmarks	Achieves approximately 82.7% on MMLU (120B model), competitive with much larger systems.	High overall performance, though not specifically optimized for reasoning.	Scores above 90% on MMLU and ranks in the top percentile for coding benchmarks.
Cost Model	Free to run locally under the Apache 2.0 license, with only hardware costs.	Free for many uses, but the license imposes restrictions on certain commercial applications.	Very low-cost API, around $0.55 per million tokens, substantially cheaper than GPT-4.
Transparency	Supports optional chain-of-thought. Open weights allow users to control reasoning visibility.	Provides only final answers. Reasoning steps are not visible.	Designed as a “glass box” system, always showing reasoning steps and self-verification.
Multimodality	Text-only.	Some newer versions, such as Llama 3.2, include image processing.	Certain versions support image inputs, with multimodal capabilities expanding.
Community & Ecosystem	Backed by OpenAI and expected to grow rapidly with fine-tunes and tool integrations.	Established ecosystem with many community fine-tunes and variants.	Rapidly expanding community, with strong adoption in cost-sensitive markets.
License	Apache 2.0 license with no restrictions.	Custom license with restrictions on scale and specific use cases.	Open license with accessible API. Models and code are publicly available.

‍

Bottom line:

GPT-OSS: A lean, reasoning-focused model that runs on modest hardware and is released under a fully open license.
Llama: A pioneering open-weight family with a vast ecosystem, though heavier at scale and less transparent in reasoning.
DeepSeek: A massive reasoning powerhouse that emphasizes transparency and offers extremely low-cost access through its API.

‍

Why OpenAI Changed Course (The Open-Source Shift)

Only a short time ago, it would have been difficult to imagine OpenAI releasing open weights for a newly developed model. Several factors, however, combined to drive this shift, including competitive dynamics, regulatory scrutiny, and philosophical reassessment.

Recognizing a Missed Opportunity

In a recent public Q&A session on Reddit, Sam Altman stated that OpenAI had been “on the wrong side of history” with regard to open-sourcing its technology. This admission reflects an acknowledgment that innovation in AI was advancing rapidly outside OpenAI’s closed ecosystem, and that true leadership required engaging with the broader community rather than operating in isolation. It also represents a partial return to the organization’s founding vision in 2015, when OpenAI pledged to openly share advances in artificial intelligence. The release of GPT-OSS can be seen as a concrete step to realign with that mission and to rebuild trust among researchers and developers.

Rejoining the Community and Ecosystem

In recent years, developers have gravitated strongly toward open models such as Llama and StableLM because they allowed unrestricted experimentation. A rich ecosystem of tools, fine-tunings, and frameworks has emerged around these open platforms. By maintaining its closed approach, OpenAI risked marginalization from this wave of grassroots innovation. With GPT-OSS, OpenAI positions itself back at the center of the open-source ecosystem. The company can now ensure that future AI applications continue to leverage its technology, while also benefiting from community-driven contributions such as model improvements, fine-tunings, and research insights.

‍

Benefits and Implications of GPT-OSS

The release of GPT-OSS marks a turning point in the AI landscape, with significant benefits and far-reaching implications:

Advanced AI for EveryoneGPT-OSS makes cutting-edge AI broadly accessible without the need for costly APIs or restrictive licensing. Researchers can study the models in detail, startups can build products on top of them, and hobbyists can run smaller versions locally. This democratization of access will inspire a wave of creative applications, ranging from niche virtual assistants to specialized professional tools.
Reduced Costs and Greater Control
Organizations can substantially lower expenses by running GPT-OSS in-house rather than paying on a per-API-call basis. This shift offers financial predictability, eliminates dependency on external pricing changes, and provides full ownership of the AI stack. Many enterprises are likely to adopt hybrid strategies, using open models for routine operations while reserving proprietary APIs for the most complex use cases.
Accelerated Innovation Through Community Contribution
As seen with earlier open models such as Llama, GPT-OSS will evolve quickly through collective input. Developers and researchers will add new features, address shortcomings, and release specialized variants tailored to domains such as healthcare, law, or education. Open collaboration creates a feedback loop that benefits both the wider community and OpenAI itself.
Increased Competition and Expanded Choice
The availability of GPT-OSS intensifies competition in the AI sector. Open models push providers to lower costs, improve performance, and enhance transparency. Businesses will enjoy greater freedom to choose between self-hosted open models or vendor-managed proprietary systems. Proprietary offerings will need to demonstrate clear added value to remain competitive.

‍

Challenges and Pitfalls of Open AI Models

While open models such as GPT-OSS provide significant advantages, they also bring important challenges that organizations must address.

Safety and Misuse
Once released, open models cannot be centrally controlled. Safeguards and filters can be removed, enabling potential misuse for disinformation, malicious content, or other harmful purposes. Although GPT-OSS underwent extensive testing by OpenAI, responsibility now shifts to developers and organizations that deploy it. The advantage of openness, however, is that vulnerabilities can be identified and addressed collaboratively by the community.
Limited Modalities
At present, GPT-OSS is text-only. It does not natively support images, audio, or video, while competing models are already moving into multimodal capabilities. Users who require multimodal functionality will need to combine GPT-OSS with other models or complementary systems.
Competitive Pressure
OpenAI’s proprietary models continue to lead in some areas, and other open platforms such as DeepSeek and Llama are advancing rapidly. Staying competitive requires organizations to closely monitor the evolving landscape and be prepared to adapt, switch, or upgrade as new capabilities emerge.

‍

Conclusion

GPT-OSS represents a pivotal shift for OpenAI and for the AI community at large. It delivers a model that is powerful, efficient, and openly available, while rivaling much larger systems such as Llama and DeepSeek. Crucially, it demonstrates a commitment to a more transparent and collaborative future for artificial intelligence, where innovation can emerge from any individual or organization.

The AI landscape is evolving rapidly. Rather than remaining a spectator, now is the time to engage, experiment, and transform open AI into practical solutions that deliver real value for your business.

‍

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q1. What are GPT-OSS models, and how do they differ from GPT-4 or ChatGPT?

GPT-OSS refers to OpenAI’s open-weight GPT models, available in 20B and 120B parameter versions, which can be downloaded and run locally. Their performance is comparable to earlier GPT-4 level models but they are optimized for efficiency and reasoning. Unlike ChatGPT, they are text-only, do not include multimodal capabilities, and lack built-in safety guardrails. Users, however, have full control and no usage restrictions.

Q2. Why did OpenAI release them now?

The decision was driven by competitive pressure from models such as Llama and DeepSeek, along with a broader industry shift toward community-driven innovation. OpenAI recognized the growing adoption of open models and chose to participate actively in this space rather than risk being left behind.

Q3. Can GPT-OSS models run on personal or enterprise hardware?

Yes. The 120B model requires approximately 80 GB of VRAM (or two 40 GB GPUs), while the 20B version can run on a single 16 GB GPU or a high-end laptop, though with reduced speed. Techniques such as quantization further lower the hardware requirements, making deployment feasible on more modest systems.

Q4. Are GPT-OSS models free for commercial use?

Yes. GPT-OSS is distributed under the Apache 2.0 license, which permits free use, modification, and commercial deployment, provided the license notice is maintained. This makes it significantly less restrictive than the licensing terms for Llama.

Q5. What are the main limitations of GPT-OSS?

Users are responsible for implementing safety filters, maintaining the models, and managing scaling. GPT-OSS does not reach GPT-5 performance levels and remains text-only. While it provides enhanced privacy, transparency, and control, it also places full responsibility for security, reliability, and ethical use on the deployer.

‍

Subscribe to newsletter

Join our e-newsletter to stay up to date on the latest AI trends!

Join FabriXAI